 |
DEU RUS FRA |
|
|
Our missionScientific reportsAbout Russia’s new economic growth model (in connection with V.V.Putin’s order)
|
|
Scientific reports
On February this year after one of State Councils Russian prime-minister addressed to scientific community asking for concrete suggestions upon economic modernization, social sphere effectiveness and variety of country’s development models. As a result of the prime-minister’s order under the auspices of two institutes – Higher School of Economics and Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration there were established expert groups supposed to present to the prime-minister by August their intellectual products.
The entering document, which is supposed to be corrected, developed and supplemented – is “ The concept of social-economic development by 2020”, approved by the governmental order in 2008.
This “new” strategy is in fact continuation of liberal policy, policy of economic demonetization. It is expected to bring monetization index only up to 60%, to increase again openness of economy, decrease state regulation of social-economic sphere. The document implies orientation to the failed doctrine of external investment sources, further privatization, commercialization (revealed and explicit) of humanitarian sphere, policy of self-withdrawal from socially and economically significant redistributions, capital and income flows, differentiated tax and subsidiary policy management.
There is supposed rejection of state motivation policy, which is classical for development management, especially in structural terms. Suggestion of expert group ą 1 (Economic growth model, headed by V.A.Mau, E.G.Yasin) practically coincide with this strategy.
Scientific approach demonstrates that government, as a manger, possesses number of independent parameters, which imply variety of management fashions. Today difference between optimal and actual parameters is huge. That is why we as the expert group suggest transition to new model.
We’re convinced that methodologically this approach is reasonable; the model does already exist and might be suggested as a real management concept. That is why we appeal to discussion, critical approach, comparisons…
>>Download full text: Economica.pdf [1923 Ęb]
|
.jpg)
  
 
|
|
Site Information | Contacts © 2006-2010 Center for Problem Analysis and GOVERNANCE At a reprint the reference to the Centre of problem analysis and public management design is required |
|
.jpg)
